Start hereRules checked 20 October 2026
From 1 September to 30 November 2025, port state control officers in the Asia-Pacific, Europe, the Mediterranean and the Black Sea ran a joint campaign on ballast water management. The Tokyo MOU alone carried out 6,930 campaign inspections. The question ships failed most often, and the one that led to most campaign detentions, was the simplest: “Is the BWMS operational?”10 In the Black Sea region about 89% of all non-compliances fell under three questions: whether the ballast water management system (BWMS) works, whether the Ballast Water Record Book (BWRB) is properly kept, and whether the crew know the Ballast Water Management Plan (BWMP).11
The paperwork side of ballast water is mature. The hard part is a treatment system that has to kill or remove organisms in whatever water the ship finds, at full ballast rate, years after installation. This lesson covers the standards, which ship must meet which, how a BWMS is approved, what to do when it cannot cope, and the convention review now under way.
Free sign-up
Sign up once to open this lesson and every other one in the Academy.
The first 2 lessons of each course are open to all. The rest need a free sign-up, which takes half a minute. We don't issue certificates, and we don't share your details.
In this lesson
- A bulk carrier, its BWMS and a muddy river port
- In plain words
- In detail
- What the rules say
- Flag and class notes
- Key numbers
- What inspectors find
- Quiz: 6 questions
Try it
A bulk carrier, its BWMS and a muddy river port
In plain words
Ships take on sea water as ballast in one port and discharge it in another, carrying plankton, bacteria and larvae across the world. Some of them take over the new place: zebra mussels in North American lakes and cholera bacteria in harbour waters are the textbook examples. The International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments (BWM Convention), in force since 8 September 2017, makes ships deal with that water before discharging it.
There are two standards. D-1 is exchange: swap the coastal water in the tanks for open-ocean water. D-2 is a performance standard: what comes out must contain fewer than a set number of living organisms. Exchange was the interim method. Today every ship must meet D-2, which in practice means a treatment system on board, using filters plus ultraviolet light, electrolysis, chemicals or other methods. Each system must be type-approved and, since 2020, approved to a mandatory code that sets the test rules.
In detail
Which ships, which documents
The Convention applies to ships that carry ballast water. Ships of 400 GT and above (other than floating platforms, FSUs and FPSOs) are surveyed and carry the International Ballast Water Management (IBWM) Certificate.1 Every ship must carry an approved BWMP and keep a BWRB; BWRB entries stay on board for at least two years after the last entry and then in the company’s control for at least three more (regulation B-2).1 From 1 February 2025 the BWRB follows the new format adopted by resolution MEPC.369(80), with a ballast tank diagram and coded entries.5
| BWRB code (MEPC.369(80)) | Operation |
|---|---|
| A | Ballast water taken on board from the aquatic environment |
| B | Ballast water discharged into the aquatic environment |
| C | Exchange, treatment by internal circulation or in tank |
| D | Uptake or discharge from or to a port-based or reception facility |
| E | Accidental or other exceptional uptake or discharge |
| F | Failures and inoperability of the BWMS |
| G | Ballast tank cleaning or flushing, removal and disposal of sediments |
| H | Additional operational procedures and general remarks |
D-1 and D-2
D-1 requires at least 95% volumetric exchange; pumping through three times the volume of each tank is accepted as meeting it (regulation D-1). Under regulation B-4 the exchange should be done at least 200 nautical miles from the nearest land in water at least 200 metres deep, or failing that at least 50 nautical miles from land in 200 metres of water, and never at the expense of the ship’s safety.1
D-2 limits what is discharged to:1
| Organism group | Limit |
|---|---|
| Organisms 50 micrometres or larger (mainly zooplankton) | Fewer than 10 viable organisms per m³ |
| Organisms from 10 to under 50 micrometres (mainly phytoplankton) | Fewer than 10 viable organisms per mL |
| Toxicogenic Vibrio cholerae (O1 and O139) | Fewer than 1 cfu per 100 mL, or per 1 g of zooplankton |
| Escherichia coli | Fewer than 250 cfu per 100 mL |
| Intestinal Enterococci | Fewer than 100 cfu per 100 mL |
The B-3 schedule: why everyone is on D-2 now
Regulation B-3, replaced by resolution MEPC.297(72) from 13 October 2019, phased ships from D-1 to D-2 at their first or second IMO renewal survey after 8 September 2017, depending on when that survey fell. Ships built on or after 8 September 2017 had to meet D-2 from delivery, and any ship to which the renewal-survey trigger did not apply had to meet D-2 by a date set by the Administration but “not later than 8 September 2024”.2 As of today all ships subject to the Convention must meet D-2; the MEPC 84 amendments will remove D-1 as a principal method from the certificate form.8
Approval of the system: G8, the BWMS Code and active substances
Regulation D-3, as amended by MEPC.296(72), requires a BWMS installed on or after 28 October 2020 to be approved under the BWMS Code (resolution MEPC.300(72), mandatory from 13 October 2019). Systems installed before that date may be approved under the earlier G8 guidelines or the Code.3 “Installed” means the contractual date of delivery of the system to the ship.4 MEPC 84 approved a unified interpretation confirming that systems approved to the 2016 G8 Guidelines may remain installed after 28 October 2020, to end confusion seen in recent PSC campaigns; it is to be added to BWM.2/Circ.66/Rev.6.8 Systems that use active substances (chlorine from electrolysis, for example) also need IMO approval of the substance under regulation D-3.2.1
The BWMS Code adds requirements that matter to the people running the system:4
- the type approval certificate lists the system design limitations (SDL): the water quality and operating parameters the system was validated for;
- control and monitoring equipment records proper functioning or failure, stores data for at least 24 months, and can display, print or export a report for official inspections (paragraphs 4.17 to 4.20);
- bypasses or overrides for safety must activate an alarm, and every bypass is recorded by the control system and in the BWRB (paragraph 7.2);
- sampling facilities are installed so that representative samples of the discharge can be taken (paragraph 7.1); and
- the type approval certificate, operation, maintenance and safety manual (OMSM), BWMP, installation drawings and commissioning procedures must be on board (paragraph 8.2).
Lesson 5 covers the commissioning test and the surveys.
When the system cannot treat: CWQ, contingency and the experience-building phase
Resolution MEPC.387(81) (March 2024) is interim guidance for ships in challenging water quality (CWQ): high sediment, high organic load or very turbid water. Its key points: build ship-specific CWQ triggers and procedures into the BWMP; a BWMS reducing flow or alarming in CWQ is working as designed, not failing; bypass is “the last resort”; after a bypass, plan decontamination before the next discharge; tell the next State that will receive the affected water; and record it in the BWRB.7 Where a system fails for other reasons, the ship’s flag and the port States concerned agree a contingency measure case by case.7
The experience-building phase set up by resolution MEPC.290(71) says a ship should not be penalised solely because a discharge exceeds D-2, provided the BWMS is approved, correctly installed, maintained to the manufacturer’s instructions, operated to the BWMP, and either its self-monitoring shows proper operation or the port State was told it was defective before discharge.6 It does not protect a ship whose system is simply not used or not maintained.
What is coming: the convention review
MEPC 80 approved a review plan, and MEPC 84 (April to May 2026) finalised amendments to the Convention for adoption at MEPC 85, with the revised BWMS Code to follow so that both enter into force together and close the experience-building phase.8 As approved, the amendments would:8
- give regulation A-3 a legal basis for discharging unmanaged or partly managed water after CWQ or a contingency measure;
- require the BWMP to state the BWMS approval status, summarise maintenance, and include CWQ and contingency procedures, with Administration re-approval of mandatory changes;
- add a BWMS maintenance log to the BWRB (regulation B-2) and evidence of crew familiarisation (B-6);
- make the maximum allowable discharge concentration (MADC) of active substances mandatory under D-2;
- extend surveys under E-1: renewal and intermediate surveys to confirm the BWMS achieves D-2, annual surveys to verify maintenance and include annual sampling of residual active substances; and
- require a time-bound repair plan to flag and destination port States after a defect.
The new 2026 G4 Guidelines on BWMPs (resolution MEPC.409(84)) were adopted at the same session; the old G4 is revoked only when the amendments enter into force.9 The entry-into-force date will be set when the amendments are adopted.
What the rules say
- BWM Convention regulation D-1 requires exchange “with an efficiency of at least 95 percent volumetric exchange”, with pumping through three times each tank’s volume accepted as meeting it.1
- Regulation D-2 requires fewer than 10 viable organisms per m³ of 50 micrometres or more and fewer than 10 per mL between 10 and 50 micrometres, plus the indicator microbe limits.1
- Regulation B-3.8, as replaced by MEPC.297(72), required ships without a qualifying renewal survey to meet D-2 “not later than 8 September 2024”.2
- Regulation D-3.1, as amended by MEPC.296(72), requires a BWMS installed on or after 28 October 2020 to be approved in accordance with the BWMS Code.3
- BWMS Code paragraph 7.2 requires any bypass of the BWMS to activate an alarm and to be recorded by the control and monitoring equipment and in the BWRB.4
- BWMS Code paragraph 4.20 requires the control and monitoring equipment to store data for at least 24 months.4
- Regulation B-2 requires BWRB entries to be kept on board for at least two years and then in the company’s control for at least three years.1
- Resolution MEPC.369(80) replaced the BWRB format in appendix II with effect from 1 February 2025.5
- Resolution MEPC.387(81) says bypass “should always be considered as the last resort” and that the next State receiving the affected water should be informed of a bypass.7
Flag and class notes
The United States regulates ballast water discharges in its waters under its own rules: 33 CFR 151.2025 lists the permitted methods, the first being a BWMS approved by the US Coast Guard under 46 CFR part 162. An IMO type approval alone is not that approval, so ships trading to the US need to check their system’s USCG status.13 Within the IMO system, flags publish their own notices on BWMP approval and contingency measures, and class societies track the review closely; ABS’s MEPC 84 brief is one summary of the approved amendments.8 Check your flag’s notices and your BWMS maker’s service letters before each change in trade.
Key numbers
| What | Value |
|---|---|
| D-1 exchange efficiency | At least 95% by volume, or 3 times tank volume pumped through1 |
| Exchange distance and depth | 200 nm and 200 m; at least 50 nm and 200 m if not possible1 |
| D-2, organisms 50 micrometres and larger | Fewer than 10 per m³1 |
| D-2, organisms 10 to under 50 micrometres | Fewer than 10 per mL1 |
| Latest date for D-2 compliance | 8 September 20242 |
| BWMS installed from this date must be BWMS Code approved | 28 October 20203 |
| BWMS control and monitoring data storage | At least 24 months4 |
| BWRB retention | 2 years on board, then 3 years under company control1 |
| New BWRB format in force | 1 February 20255 |
| Tokyo MOU 2025 campaign: CIC-topic detention rate | 0.43% (30 detentions in 6,930 CIC inspections)10 |
What inspectors find
- In the Tokyo MOU’s 2025 campaign the most common deficiency, and the main cause of campaign detentions, was against “Is the BWMS operational?”; 26 of the 30 campaign detentions were of high-risk ships.10
- In the Black Sea MoU about 89.3% of non-compliances concerned BWMS operability, BWRB completion and crew familiarity with the BWMP, with BWMS operability the largest single issue.11
- In the Mediterranean MoU the weakest answer was on the BWRB being properly filled in, with 7.83% negative answers, and the campaign-topic detention rate was 1.6%.12
- Ships approved to the 2016 G8 Guidelines were questioned in Paris and Tokyo MoU campaigns about whether their systems could remain installed after 28 October 2020, which led to the MEPC 84 unified interpretation.8
FAQ
Our BWMS was approved under G8 in 2016. Is it still legal after 28 October 2020?
Yes, if it was installed before that date. Regulation D-3.1.2 allows systems installed before 28 October 2020 to be approved under the guidelines, and MEPC 84 approved a unified interpretation confirming that 2016 G8-approved systems may remain installed. What matters to port State control is that it works, is maintained and is used.
Does the experience-building phase mean we cannot be detained?
No. It only protects a ship from penalties solely for a D-2 exceedance, and only if the system is approved, correctly installed, maintained and operated according to the BWMP. A system that is not operational is a deficiency, and was the most common detention ground in the 2025 campaign.
What should the BWRB say after a bypass?
MEPC.387(81) asks for the reason ballasting was stopped and the circumstances, with the bypass recorded (code F covers failures and inoperability) and the next receiving State informed, for example on the pre-arrival ballast water reporting form.
Quiz6 questions
Sources
- 1
International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments, 2004 (text adopted by the Conference, BWM/CONF/36 dated 16 February 2004; original text, later amended), annex regulations B-2, B-4, D-1, D-2, D-3 and E-1. Copy published by the Hong Kong Marine Department. https://mardep.gov.hk/filemanager/en/share/aboutus/pdf/scc/scc_p149a.pdf
- 2
IMO Resolution MEPC.297(72), Amendments to the BWM Convention (implementation schedule of ballast water management for ships, regulation B-3), adopted 13 April 2018, in force 13 October 2019, annex paragraphs 1 to 10. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.297(72).pdf
- 3
IMO Resolution MEPC.296(72), Amendments to the BWM Convention (BWMS Code, regulations A-1 and D-3), adopted 13 April 2018, in force 13 October 2019, annex. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.296(72).pdf
- 4
IMO Resolution MEPC.300(72), Code for Approval of Ballast Water Management Systems (BWMS Code), adopted 13 April 2018, operative paragraphs 2, 4 and 5, and annex paragraphs 4.17 to 4.21, 6.5, 7.1 to 7.3 and 8.2 to 8.3. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.300(72).pdf
- 5
IMO Resolution MEPC.369(80), Amendments to the BWM Convention (Form of Ballast Water Record Book, appendix II), adopted 7 July 2023, in force 1 February 2025. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.369(80).pdf
- 6
IMO Resolution MEPC.290(71), The experience-building phase associated with the BWM Convention, adopted 7 July 2017, operative paragraph 4. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.290(71).pdf
- 7
IMO Resolution MEPC.387(81), Interim guidance on the application of the BWM Convention to ships operating in challenging water quality conditions, adopted 22 March 2024, operative paragraph 3 and annex paragraphs 5 to 13 and 47 to 49. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.387(81).pdf
- 8
ABS, Regulatory News: IMO MEPC 84 Brief, 1 May 2026, section Ballast water management: Review of the Ballast Water Management Convention and Unified Interpretation to regulation D-3. https://ww2.eagle.org/content/dam/eagle/regulatory-news/2026/ABS-MEPC-84-Brief.pdf
- 9
IMO Resolution MEPC.409(84), 2026 Guidelines for ballast water management and development of ballast water management plans (G4), adopted 1 May 2026. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.409(84).pdf
- 10
Tokyo MOU Secretariat, Press release: Preliminary results of the CIC on Ballast Water Management 2025, 17 March 2026. https://www.tokyo-mou.org/press-releases/2026/03/17/preliminary-results-of-cic-on-ballast-water-management-2004
- 11
Black Sea MoU Secretariat, Press release: Preliminary results of the CIC on Ballast Water Management, 19 February 2026. https://bsmou.org/downloads/press-releases/BS%20MoU%20Press%20Release%20CIC%20on%20Ballast%20Water%20Management.pdf
- 12
Mediterranean MoU Secretariat, Press release PR3-2026 on the CIC on the Ballast Water Management Convention, 2 April 2026. https://www.medmou.org/Documents/PR3-2026.pdf
- 13
US Code of Federal Regulations, 33 CFR 151.2025, Ballast water management requirements, paragraph (a). https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/33/151.2025
Rules checked 20 October 2026. VSL Safety is not an approved training provider and doesn't issue certificates. These lessons don't replace STCW training, or the manufacturer's training and certification that service technicians need.