Start hereRules checked 20 October 2026
In 2019 a tanker operator was convicted in Louisiana and fined US$2 million. Its senior officers had discharged oily waste by flushing the sensor of the ship’s pollution prevention equipment with fresh water, which “tricked the system into detecting a much lower effluent oil content” than was actually going over the side. The Oil Record Book then recorded 87,705 gallons as properly processed.8
The rules saw that trick coming. Since 2003 the IMO specification for the 15 ppm bilge alarm has required the alarm to go off whenever clean water is used for cleaning or zeroing, every access beyond basic checks to need a broken seal, and 18 months of data to stay on board.3 An alarm that is in date, sealed and recording is the engineer’s best defence in a port state control inspection. This lesson takes the system apart, explains each requirement, and sets out the five-yearly calibration rule that the class surveyor checks every year.
Try it
Parts of a 15 ppm bilge separator system
In plain words
An oily water separator is a machine that splits the oil out of bilge water. Oil is lighter than water, so the simplest separators let it rise and collect it at the top; others add coalescing plates, filters or membranes to catch smaller droplets. The separated oil goes to a residue tank. The cleaned water goes towards the ship’s side.
Before that water leaves the ship, a small sample is drawn continuously into the 15 ppm bilge alarm, an instrument that measures how much oil is in it, most commonly by optical means. If the reading goes above 15 ppm, or the instrument fails, the alarm sounds and a three-way valve automatically turns the flow back into the ship. A recorder keeps a log of when the system ran and when it alarmed.
The alarm is only useful if it tells the truth. That is why it has seals, records and a calibration certificate, and why it must be checked by the manufacturer or someone the manufacturer authorises at least every five years. On board, the crew do the day-to-day checks the manufacturer allows, and test the whole system with the overboard valve closed.
In detail
Which standard applies to your equipment
Resolution MEPC.107(49) applies to equipment on ships whose keel was laid on or after 1 January 2005, and to new installations from that date on older ships as far as reasonable and practicable. Equipment fitted to older ships may instead meet resolution A.393(X) (installed from 14 November 1978) or MEPC.60(33) (installed from 30 April 1994).1 The IOPP Supplement states which standard each item was approved to, and a copy of the type approval certificate for the separator and the alarm must be carried on board.11 MARPOL Annex I regulation 14 tells the Administration to “have regard to” the IMO specification when approving equipment, which is how the guidelines become binding in practice.7
The separator
The separator must work automatically with fail-safe arrangements, need no adjustment of valves to start, run for 24 hours of normal duty without attention, and keep the effluent at or below 15 ppm when its feed changes from bilge water to oil, to emulsified bilge water or to air.2 At type approval it is tested with three fluids: a residual fuel (ISO 8217 RMG 35, density not less than 980 kg/m³), a distillate (DMA, not less than 830 kg/m³) and an emulsion containing surfactant and iron oxides.6 The emulsion test matters on board: detergents and chemical bilge cleaners create emulsions the separator may not handle, and adding chemicals to get round the discharge conditions is itself banned by MARPOL Annex I regulation 15.8.7
The 15 ppm bilge alarm, clause by clause
| Clause of MEPC.107(49) | Requirement |
|---|---|
| 4.2.5 | A ppm display. Calibration on board should not be necessary, but on-board testing to the manufacturer’s instructions is permitted. |
| 4.2.6 | Response time 5 seconds or less. |
| 4.2.7 | Alarm pre-set by the manufacturer to activate above 15 ppm, and also on failure, warm-up or loss of power. |
| 4.2.8 | A simple means on board to check drift, repeatability and re-zeroing (recommended). |
| 4.2.9 | Records date, time, alarm status and separator operating status; stores data for at least 18 months; data kept on board for 18 months if the unit is replaced. |
| 4.2.10 | Any access beyond the 4.2.8 checks requires breaking a seal; the alarm activates whenever clean water is used for cleaning or zeroing. |
| 4.2.11 (as amended by MEPC.285(70)) | Calibration certificate checked at IOPP surveys; accuracy check by the manufacturer or persons authorised by it, at intervals not exceeding five years, or the manufacturer’s term if shorter. |
At type approval the alarm’s accuracy must be within 5 ppm, even with contaminants other than oil present and with the power supply 10% off its design value.63
Installation
The installation rules in section 6 are what an inspector walks along:5
- a sampling point in a vertical section of the effluent pipe, close to the separator outlet;
- a recirculating facility after and next to the overboard outlet of the stopping device, so the whole system can be tested with the overboard valve closed, arranged so it can never bypass the separator;
- a feed pump of not more than 110% of the separator’s rated capacity;
- a permanently attached plate with the operating or installation limits;
- the operating and maintenance manuals on board for both the separator and the alarm;
- an overall response time, from effluent above 15 ppm to the stopping device acting, as short as possible and never more than 20 seconds; and
- a sample line that gives a truly representative sample at adequate pressure and flow.
The five-yearly calibration
Since resolution MEPC.285(70) (28 October 2016) replaced paragraph 4.2.11, the rule reads: the validity of the calibration certificate is checked at IOPP annual, intermediate and renewal surveys; the accuracy check is done by “a manufacturer or persons authorized by the manufacturer” at intervals not exceeding five years after commissioning, or within the term in the manufacturer’s instructions, whichever is shorter; the unit may instead be swapped for a calibrated one; and the certificate showing the date of the last check stays on board.4 Before 2016 the check was tied to the IOPP renewal survey.3 The resolution “recommends” that governments apply the amendment, and flags such as Liberia have written it into their notices word for word.10
Working out the due date: take the date on the current calibration certificate (or the commissioning date if there has been none), add 60 months, and compare with the manufacturer’s stated interval from the same date. The earlier of the two is the deadline. Many manufacturers specify a shorter term than five years, so read the manual, not just the resolution. Plan the visit or the exchange unit well before the annual survey window opens, because an expired certificate is a finding at the survey and at any port state control inspection.
On-board testing and maintenance
The manufacturer defines the routine maintenance in the operating and maintenance manuals, and “all routine and repair maintenance” is to be recorded.6 That record belongs in the ship’s maintenance system: MEPC.1/Circ.736/Rev.2 says general OWS maintenance does not have to be entered in the Oil Record Book.12 A typical on-board function test, done to the manufacturer’s procedure, uses the recirculation line with the overboard valve shut: start the system, check that the alarm reads and records, use the manufacturer’s test function or approved test method to make the reading cross 15 ppm, and confirm that the three-way valve diverts within the response time and that the recorder logs the event. Do not open sealed parts of the alarm; if a seal must be broken for repair, it is a job for the manufacturer or its authorised technician, and the repair and resealing should be recorded.
Any failure of the separator, the alarm or the stopping device is entered in the Oil Record Book under code F (items 19 to 21), with a matching code I entry if the overboard valve is sealed shut while the system is out of order.1213
What the rules say
- MEPC.107(49) section 4.2.6 requires the response time of the 15 ppm bilge alarm “should not exceed 5 seconds”.3
- Section 4.2.9 requires the alarm to record date, time, alarm status and separator operating status, and to store data for at least 18 months.3
- Section 4.2.10 requires a broken seal for any access beyond the drift and zero checks, and that the alarm is “always activated whenever clean water is used for cleaning or zeroing”.3
- Section 4.2.11, as replaced by MEPC.285(70), requires calibration by the manufacturer or persons it authorises at intervals not exceeding five years after commissioning, or the manufacturer’s shorter term, with the certificate checked at IOPP annual, intermediate and renewal surveys.4
- Section 6.1.1 requires a sampling point near the separator outlet and a recirculating facility that allows testing with the overboard discharge closed without ever bypassing the separator.5
- Section 6.1.2 limits the feed pump to 110% of the separator’s rated capacity.5
- Section 6.2.1 limits the overall time between effluent above 15 ppm and the stopping device acting to “not more than 20 s”.5
- Annex part 2, paragraph 2.2.1 requires the alarm’s accuracy at type approval to be within 5 ppm.6
- MARPOL Annex I regulation 17.5 requires any failure of the oil filtering equipment to be recorded in the Oil Record Book Part I.13
Flag and class notes
The class society or other recognised organisation checks the calibration certificate at every IOPP annual, intermediate and renewal survey, and confirms at the intermediate and renewal surveys that the equipment is in good working order.47 Several flags repeat the MEPC.285(70) wording as a flag requirement; Liberia’s Marine Notice POL-001 (Rev. 11/24) does so and also states that a separator or bilge alarm approved to the older standards (A.393(X) or MEPC.60(33)) that is found defective and must be replaced has to be replaced by equipment meeting MEPC.107(49) as amended.10 Some manufacturers set a calibration term shorter than five years, and that shorter term then applies under the amended 4.2.11. Check your flag’s MARPOL notice and the alarm manual, and keep both with the calibration certificate.
Key numbers
| What | Value |
|---|---|
| Maximum oil content at the alarm set point | 15 ppm3 |
| Alarm accuracy at type approval | Within 5 ppm6 |
| Alarm response time | 5 seconds or less3 |
| Overall response, effluent above 15 ppm to stopping device acting | 20 seconds or less5 |
| Alarm data storage | At least 18 months3 |
| Accuracy check (calibration) | Not more than 5 years, or the manufacturer’s term if shorter4 |
| Feed pump capacity | Not more than 110% of separator rated capacity5 |
| Unattended running at type approval | At least 24 hours2 |
| Applies to equipment on ships with keel laid | On or after 1 January 20051 |
What inspectors find
- In the Caribbean MoU’s MARPOL Annex I campaign (2013, 182 ships), the questions that most often drew a “no” on the equipment were “Is the 15 ppm alarm correctly adjusted and operable?” (7 ships) and “Is the 3-way-valve or stopping device functioning?” (5 ships); one ship had an illegal bypass.9
- In the Ridgebury Alexandra Z case (2019), senior officers flushed the sensor with fresh water so that it read low while oily waste went overboard, then recorded 87,705 gallons as properly processed. The company paid US$2 million and had to run an environmental compliance plan on all its ships calling at US ports for four years.8
- On the cruise ship in the Princess case (2016), engineers ran clean sea water through the overboard equipment during an illegal discharge to create a false digital record of a legal one.14
- A calibration certificate older than five years, or older than the manufacturer’s term, is a straightforward survey and port state control finding under the amended 4.2.11.4
FAQ
Can the chief engineer calibrate the 15 ppm alarm on board?
No. Paragraph 4.2.5 says calibration on board should not be necessary, and 4.2.11 as amended limits the accuracy check to the manufacturer or persons it authorises. The crew may carry out the on-board tests the manufacturer allows, such as drift and zero checks, without breaking seals.
Is swapping the measuring cell for a calibrated one acceptable?
Yes, if the manufacturer supplies it as a calibrated unit with its certificate. Paragraph 4.2.11 allows the unit to be “replaced by a calibrated 15 ppm bilge alarm”. Make sure the recorded data from the old unit stays available on board for 18 months (4.2.9).
Our alarm keeps alarming on clean water. Is it faulty?
Not necessarily. Paragraph 4.2.10 requires the alarm to activate whenever clean water is used for cleaning or zeroing, precisely so that fresh water cannot be used to fake a low reading during a discharge. Follow the manufacturer’s cleaning and zeroing procedure and expect the alarm.
Quiz6 questions
Sources
- 1
IMO Resolution MEPC.107(49), Revised guidelines and specifications for pollution prevention equipment for machinery space bilges of ships (adopted 18 July 2003), annex section 1.3, Applicability. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.107(49).pdf
- 2
IMO Resolution MEPC.107(49), annex sections 3.2 and 4.1, 15 ppm bilge separator. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.107(49).pdf
- 3
IMO Resolution MEPC.107(49), annex section 4.2, 15 ppm bilge alarm, paragraphs 4.2.5 to 4.2.11 (original text of 4.2.11). https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.107(49).pdf
- 4
IMO Resolution MEPC.285(70), Amendments to the revised guidelines and specifications for pollution prevention equipment for machinery space bilges of ships (adopted 28 October 2016), operative paragraph 2 and annex paragraph 3 (new paragraph 4.2.11). https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.285(70).pdf
- 5
IMO Resolution MEPC.107(49), annex section 6, Installation requirements, paragraphs 6.1.1 to 6.1.4 and 6.2.1 to 6.2.3. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.107(49).pdf
- 6
IMO Resolution MEPC.107(49), guidelines section 1.1.6 (maintenance), annex part 1, paragraph 1.2.4 (test fluids), and part 2, paragraph 2.2.1 (accuracy of the 15 ppm bilge alarm). https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.107(49).pdf
- 7
MARPOL Annex I (revised by resolution MEPC.117(52)), regulation 14, paragraphs 6 and 7, regulation 15.8 and regulation 6.1.3. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.117(52).pdf
- 8
US Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs, Tank Vessel Operator Convicted and Sentenced for Oil Discharge Offense, Vessel Captain Indicted (Ridgebury Alexandra Z), 14 February 2019. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/tank-vessel-operator-convicted-and-sentenced-oil-discharge-offense-vessel-captain-indicted
- 9
Caribbean MOU, Report on the CIC on MARPOL Annex I carried out by the Caribbean MOU, 1 September to 30 November 2013, table 2, questions 4 to 6. https://caribbeanmou.org/sites/default/files/MARPOL%20Annex%20I%20CIC%20Outcome%20Report.pdf
- 10
Liberia Maritime Authority, Marine Notice POL-001 Rev. 11/24, Prevention of Pollution from Ships, paragraph 1.1.1. https://www.liscr.com/sites/default/files/online_library/POL-001.pdf
- 11
IMO Resolution MEPC.107(49), annex section 5.2, Approval and certification procedures, paragraphs 5.2.1 and 5.2.2. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.107(49).pdf
- 12
IMO MEPC.1/Circ.736/Rev.2, Guidance for the recording of operations in the Oil Record Book Part I, Machinery space operations (all ships), 6 October 2011, annex, general guidance and usage of codes D, E and F (examples 10 to 16bis). https://www.westpandi.com/getmedia/66fb9134-63d6-4d36-8997-d9bce7fa2ccf/736-Rev-2.pdf
- 13
MARPOL Annex I (revised by resolution MEPC.117(52)), regulation 17.5. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/KnowledgeCentre/IndexofIMOResolutions/MEPCDocuments/MEPC.117(52).pdf
- 14
US Department of Justice, Office of Public Affairs, Princess Cruise Lines to Pay Largest-Ever Criminal Penalty for Deliberate Vessel Pollution, 1 December 2016. https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/princess-cruise-lines-pay-largest-ever-criminal-penalty-deliberate-vessel-pollution
Rules checked 20 October 2026. VSL Safety is not an approved training provider and doesn't issue certificates. These lessons don't replace STCW training, or the manufacturer's training and certification that service technicians need.